{"id":5273,"date":"2000-11-24T14:15:48","date_gmt":"2000-11-24T14:15:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/?p=5273"},"modified":"2014-11-24T14:38:04","modified_gmt":"2014-11-24T14:38:04","slug":"%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%b4%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%b2%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b5%d0%bb%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b2%d0%be-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%ba%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%b5%d0%bd%d1%82-%d0%b2%d1%8a%d0%b2-%d0%b2%d1%80%d1%8a%d0%b7%d0%ba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%b4%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%b2%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b5%d0%bb%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b2%d0%be-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%ba%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%b5%d0%bd%d1%82-%d0%b2%d1%8a%d0%b2-%d0%b2%d1%80%d1%8a%d0%b7%d0%ba\/","title":{"rendered":"Representation of a client in connection with an appeal against rejection of the State Energy and Water Regulatory Commission for a certificate of origin for renewable electricity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Our team represented  a leading energy investment company working on a project to build nine hydropower Mini hydroelectric plants along the Iskar river in proceedings to challenge the refusal of the State Energy and Water Regulatory Commission to consider a request for certificate of origin for renewable electricity produced in the past.<br \/>\nThe three-member panel of the Supreme Administrative Court overthrew the refusal and returned the case for reconsideration. The decision was appealed by the state regulator before a five-member panel of the Supreme Administrative Court, which upheld the first instance.<\/p>\n<p>Practice: <a href=\"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/practice\/litigation\/\">Litigation<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Our team represented a leading energy investment company working on a project to build nine hydropower Mini hydroelectric plants along the Iskar river in proceedings to challenge the refusal of the State Energy and Water Regulatory Commission to consider a request for certificate of origin for renewable electricity produced in the past. The three-member panel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,74],"tags":[],"coauthors":[9,43],"class_list":["post-5273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cases","category-litigation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5273"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5277,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5273\/revisions\/5277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5273"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirm-bg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=5273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}